Why Nuclear Energy Stocks Could Be the Smartest AI Play

Why Nuclear Energy Stocks Could Be the Smartest AI Play

When it comes to making money in the stock market, I’ve found that one of the best approaches is to invest in problem-solving businesses. After all, companies that figure out how to solve a widespread problem can generate sustainable demand, revenues, and profits. And that should all lead to higher stock prices. 

By that logic, it may be time to check out energy stocks

As recent years have made clear, electric grids across the world are already being strained by increasing energy demands. And thanks to the rise of AI, the world may soon face a massive energy crisis. 

That’s because AI applications require far more energy than traditional incumbents. For example, a typical ChatGPT search uses 10X more power than a traditional Google search. 

So, as the world shifts from legacy to AI computer applications across all sectors and industries, the world’s energy demands will increase dramatically. 

Indeed, Goldman Sachs estimates that, thanks to AI, data center power demand will grow 160% by 2030. Morgan Stanley is calling for a near 5X increase in generative AI power demand over the next three years. And Wells Fargo projects AI power demand will surge 8,050% between 2024 and 2030. 

Energy demand is likely to skyrocket over the coming years.

That’s a huge problem because the global energy supply is already limited. Therefore, whoever provides a solution – and produces the energy necessary to power the AI Boom – could generate huge demand, revenues, and profits in the coming years. 

Such problem-solving companies could be the next batch of AI stock winners. 

And in that world, I like nuclear energy stocks the best

Follow me here… 

Nuclear Energy: A Surprisingly Safe Power Source

Once upon a time, nuclear energy was hailed as the best power source in the world. 

That was years ago, before a few headline disasters – like that of Fukushima in 2011, Chernobyl in 1986, and Three Mile Island in 1979 – reminded the world that nuclear power plants can, indeed, be very dangerous. 

But that was then… and this is now. 

The Fukushima meltdown happened almost 15 years ago. Chernobyl’s disaster took place about 40 years ago. And the Three Mile Island accident was almost 50 years ago now. 

Believe it or not, a lot has changed in all that time. 

Nuclear power technology has improved dramatically over the last few decades. The industry has developed new fuels more resistant to radiation, corrosion, and higher temperatures as well as advanced instrumentation to monitor every system and process. 

This sector’s technology has meaningfully improved. 

In fact, recent studies show that, based on real-world usage data, nuclear power plants are significantly safer than traditional fossil fuel plants, like coal, oil, and natural gas. 

When it comes to coal, the death rate from both accidents and air pollution is about 24.6 deaths per terawatt-hour of electricity produced. (For reference, 1 terawatt-hour is the annual electricity consumption of about 150,000 people.) 

The death rate for oil is about 18.4 deaths per terawatt-hour. Natural gas – about 2.8 deaths. 

And nuclear power is responsible for just 0.03 deaths. 

So, it seems the predispositions people have about nuclear energy actually run entirely counter to the hard data that engineers have collected on this matter. 

Nuclear energy is objectively safer than most other energy sources. That’s just what the numbers say. After all, there is a reason that it used to be hailed as the best energy source in the world.

admin